On May 2, 2025, Nigerian social media influencer and activist Martins Vincent Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), was arrested by operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) at a Guaranty Trust Bank (GTBank) branch in Area 3, Garki, Abuja. The incident has sparked widespread debate, with allegations of inhumane treatment, illegal detention, and a possible agenda against the outspoken critic. This article delves into the details of the arrest, the reactions from VDM’s camp, and the broader implications of the event.
The Arrest: What Happened?
According to multiple reports, VDM was detained after accompanying his mother to GTBank to address unauthorized debits from her account. His lawyer, Deji Adeyanju, confirmed the arrest, alleging that VDM and a friend were locked inside the bank’s exit door for over five minutes to facilitate their apprehension by EFCC operatives. Adeyanju described the treatment as “inhumane” and announced plans to sue GTBank for its role in the incident.
VDM’s brother and close associate, known as Dkokopee, provided further details, claiming that the activist was labeled a “bandit” by EFCC officials and threatened with violence in the presence of his mother. They also alleged that VDM sustained serious injuries during the arrest but was denied medical care. Efforts to secure his release or obtain clarity on the reasons for his detention have reportedly been futile, with the EFCC refusing to disclose specific allegations.
As of May 3, 2025, neither GTBank nor the EFCC has issued an official statement addressing the allegations, leaving room for speculation and public outrage. VDM’s brother has warned that the matter “won’t end quietly,” while Dkokopee hinted at a possible conspiracy, suggesting that the EFCC is targeting VDM because of critical information he possesses about the agency.
Background: VeryDarkMan’s History with the EFCC
This is not VDM’s first brush with the EFCC. The activist has a history of publicly criticizing the agency, accusing it of selective justice and ethnic bias. In April 2025, VDM lambasted the EFCC over the arrest of businessman Emeka Okonkwo, aka E-Money, for alleged naira abuse. He questioned why the agency swiftly targeted E-Money, an Igbo businessman, while allegedly ignoring similar offenses by others, such as the children of billionaire Rasaq Okoya. VDM’s outspokenness led him to warn another businessman, Obi Cubana, to be cautious, claiming he could be the EFCC’s next target.
Additionally, in September 2024, VDM was linked to a controversy involving allegations that crossdresser Bobrisky bribed EFCC officers with N15 million to drop charges against him. The EFCC responded by ordering an investigation and inviting both VDM and Bobrisky to its Lagos office, though the outcome of that probe remains unclear.
These incidents highlight VDM’s reputation as a vocal critic of powerful institutions, which some speculate may have contributed to his recent arrest. His brother’s claim that the EFCC has an “agenda” against him echoes sentiments expressed by supporters who view the detention as retaliation for his activism.
Public Reaction and Solidarity
The arrest has ignited a firestorm on social media, with Nigerians expressing solidarity with VDM and condemning the EFCC and GTBank. One individual announced plans to withdraw all funds from GTBank unless VDM is released or his whereabouts are clarified, reflecting growing distrust in the bank’s role in the incident. Others have called for prayers and urged the activist to remain strong.
Posts on X have amplified the controversy, with users alleging that the EFCC’s actions are oppressive and targeted at silencing a critic who champions the poor. One post claimed that the agency’s refusal to provide reasons for VDM’s detention points to a deeper conspiracy. However, these claims remain unverified, and the lack of an official statement from the EFCC has fueled speculation.
Broader Implications
VDM’s arrest raises critical questions about the EFCC’s operations and its treatment of public figures who challenge its authority. The agency has faced accusations of selective enforcement in the past, and this incident may further erode public trust. The allegations of physical assault and denial of medical care, if substantiated, could also spark a broader conversation about human rights and the rule of law in Nigeria.
Moreover, the involvement of GTBank highlights the complex relationship between financial institutions and law enforcement. If Adeyanju’s lawsuit against the bank proceeds, it could set a precedent for holding private entities accountable for their role in facilitating controversial arrests.
Conclusion
The arrest of VeryDarkMan by the EFCC has thrust the agency and GTBank into the spotlight, with allegations of injustice and vendetta dominating the narrative. As VDM’s supporters demand answers, the silence from the EFCC and GTBank only deepens the controversy. Whether this incident will lead to legal repercussions or further activism remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: VeryDarkMan’s detention has struck a chord, amplifying calls for transparency and accountability in Nigeria’s fight against financial crimes.
Until the EFCC provides clarity on the reasons for VDM’s arrest, the saga will likely continue to dominate headlines, with the activist’s fate hanging in the balance. For now, Nigerians await official statements and hope for a resolution that upholds justice and fairness.
Join our Whatsapp channel to stay updated always!
