In the ever-evolving landscape of Nigerian politics, rumors and allegations often swirl, capturing public attention and sparking heated debates. One such claim recently made headlines, alleging that Peter Obi, the former Labour Party presidential candidate and a prominent figure in Nigerian politics, held a clandestine meeting with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in Rome to discuss a purported ₦225 billion debt crisis involving Fidelity Bank. Obi has since issued a strong rebuttal, labeling the allegations as baseless and malicious.
The Allegation
The controversy began with a report published by Sahara Reporters, a media outlet known for its investigative journalism and, at times, polarizing narratives. The article claimed that Peter Obi, who ran as the Labour Party’s presidential candidate in the 2023 general elections, traveled to Rome to meet President Tinubu in a bid to address a financial crisis allegedly engulfing Fidelity Bank. According to the report, the bank was grappling with a staggering ₦225 billion debt, and Obi, described as the owner of the bank, sought Tinubu’s intervention to prevent its collapse due to court judgments against it.
The timing of the alleged meeting was said to coincide with the inauguration of Pope Leo XIV, a significant event at the Vatican that drew global attention. The claim suggested that Obi used the occasion as a cover to hold discreet discussions with the Nigerian president, leveraging their presence in Rome to address the purported financial turmoil. Such an allegation, if true, would have raised serious questions about Obi’s business interests, his political alliances, and the state of Nigeria’s banking sector.
Peter Obi’s Response
Peter Obi wasted no time in addressing the allegations, issuing a detailed statement to set the record straight. In his response, he categorically denied holding any private meeting with President Tinubu in Rome. According to Obi, his trip to the Italian capital was solely for the purpose of attending the historic inauguration of Pope Leo XIV at Saint Peter’s Basilica. He emphasized that his visit was driven by his commitment to his faith and his desire to witness the significant moment in the Catholic Church’s history.
Obi clarified that his only interaction with President Tinubu during the event was a brief, formal greeting, as the two were seated in close proximity—Obi behind Tinubu—during the ceremony. “At no point did we hold any private or secret meeting,” Obi stated, dismissing the claims as “baseless, malicious, and entirely false.” He accused those behind the report of being “paid blackmailers” intent on tarnishing his reputation and sowing discord among Nigerians.
Addressing the specific claim about Fidelity Bank, Obi was equally resolute. He denied owning the bank, clarifying that his involvement with Fidelity was limited to serving as a member of its board in the past. “I do not own Fidelity Bank, nor have I ever held a controlling stake in it,” he asserted. Obi further debunked the notion of a ₦225 billion debt crisis, arguing that the allegations were fabricated to mislead the public and damage his credibility.
Fidelity Bank and the Alleged Debt Crisis
The claim that Fidelity Bank is facing a ₦225 billion debt crisis is a significant aspect of this controversy. Fidelity Bank is one of Nigeria’s leading financial institutions, known for its role in retail and corporate banking. A debt crisis of such magnitude would have far-reaching implications, not only for the bank but also for Nigeria’s broader financial sector, which has faced challenges in recent years due to economic volatility and regulatory pressures.
However, Obi’s denial of the crisis, coupled with his clarification that he does not own the bank, raises questions about the veracity of the original report. Without concrete evidence—such as court documents or financial statements—confirming the alleged debt, the claim remains speculative. It’s worth noting that Sahara Reporters did not provide specific details or verifiable sources to substantiate the ₦225 billion figure, which weakens the credibility of the allegation.
In Nigeria’s banking sector, court judgments against financial institutions are not uncommon, often stemming from disputes with creditors, regulators, or clients. If Fidelity Bank were indeed facing such a crisis, it would likely have attracted attention from Nigeria’s Central Bank, financial analysts, and the media. As of now, no independent reports have corroborated the claims made by Sahara Reporters, suggesting that the story may be more about political mudslinging than financial reality.
Join our Whatsapp channel to stay updated always!
