Israel: which countries have taken concrete actions to pressure that nation to stop its offensive in Gaza

Colombia, which announced the breaking of relations with Israel, and Türkiye, which suspended trade with that country, have been the last to take specific steps to try to influence Israel’s actions.

The impact of these measures may be “merely symbolic,” Yossi Mekelberg, an analyst with Chatham House’s Middle East and North Africa Program, explains to BBC Mundo. “But its cumulative effect on its diplomatic isolation or what it says about Israel and how it conducts the war is important.”.

It is not the first time that Israel has faced condemnation from other countries for its actions in Gaza or the West Bank. But never before has international pressure been as intense as it is now, mainly due to the unprecedented scale of destruction caused by the Israeli retaliation to the Hamas attack on October 7.

On that date, Israel suffered the worst aggression in its 75-year history, with the death of some 1,200 people at the hands of Hamas militiamen, who also took 253 hostages, and its response was implacable: more than 34,000 people have died Since then in Gaza due to the bombings of the Israeli army, 85% of the population has been displaced from their homes and about half, around 1.1 million people, are on the brink of famine, according to the UN.

Given this situation, we explain below which countries have decided to take concrete actions against Israel.

After the outbreak of war, and as the devastation of Gaza increased, a limited group of countries decided to withdraw their ambassadors or suspend diplomatic relations with Israel.

Countries in the region, such as Jordan, Bahrain and Turkey, sent their ambassadors back home, something that Chad also decided to do. and several Latin American governments, such as those of Chile, Honduras or Colombia.

The latter has now decided to go one step further and suspend diplomatic relations, thus joining Bolivia and Belize.

“Today humanity, in all the streets, agrees with us. The era of genocide, of the extermination of an entire people before our eyes, before our humanity, cannot return. If Palestine dies, humanity dies and we will not let die,” said President Gustavo Petro in a speech this Wednesday, May 1, in which he announced the diplomatic break.

Six months earlier, on October 31, the Bolivian government spokesperson announced the same decision in similar words.

Bolivia “has made the determination to break diplomatic relations with the State of Israel in repudiation and condemnation of the aggressive and disproportionate Israeli military offensive being carried out in the Gaza Strip,” said its Vice Foreign Minister, Freddy Mamani, at the time.

Two weeks later, Belize announced in a statement the suspension of diplomatic relations with Israel due to the “incessant indiscriminate bombing” of Gaza and because, since October 7, Israel had “constantly” violated international law.

What does this breakup translate into?

Well, actually, it’s not clear. None of these three countries has great political weight in the Middle East and their commercial and diplomatic exchanges with Israel before this crisis were modest.

Colombia is, however, Israel’s second trading partner in Latin America after Brazil. Both countries signed a free trade agreement in 2020, and the Colombian military uses Israeli aircraft and weapons to fight drug cartels and insurgent groups.

However, for the moment, this agreement does not appear to have been affected, and the Colombian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has communicated its intention to “maintain the activity of the respective consular sections in Tel Aviv and Bogotá.”

The effect of this break in relations is mainly “symbolic, and manifests a sense of isolation and a change in attitude towards Israel,” analyzes Mekelberg.

But the Chatam House expert also remembers that these types of decisions also usually have an ideological and internal political component: “It’s like what happened with Brazil; “With Bolsonaro there was total support for Israel and when the left returned, the criticism returned.”

Last Thursday, Turkey announced that it was suspending all trade with Israel until the government led by Benjamin Netanyahu accepts “an uninterrupted and sufficient flow” of humanitarian aid in Gaza.

According to the Turkish Trade Minister, “export and import transactions related to Israel, covering all products, have been stopped.”

Trade between both countries amounted to US$7 billion last year.

Turkey was the first Muslim-majority country to recognize Israel, in 1949. But bilateral relations have worsened in recent decades.

The most tense episode occurred in 2010, when Turkey broke diplomatic relations with Israel after that country attacked a flotilla of six Turkish ships in international waters that were trying to reach Gaza, breaking the maritime blockade that Israel imposes on the Strip.

In the assault by Israeli commandos, 10 Turkish pro-Palestinian activists died.

Relations were restored in 2016, but both countries expelled their respective ambassadors two years later over a new dispute over the killing of Palestinians on the Gaza border.

The situation has worsened since October 7. Netanyahu and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan Mutual accusations have been made that have been increasing.

While Erdogan has compared the Israeli to Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin and described him as “the butcher of Gaza”, Netanyahu has said of the Turkish leader that he “supports the mass murderers and rapists of Hamas, denies the Armenian genocide [y] massacres the Kurds in their own country.”

Several countries – such as Canada, Italy, Japan, Belgium and Spain – have announced in recent months that they would stop selling weapons to Israel.

However, analyzing these decisions in a little more detail, the reality that prevails is a little different.

In Belgium, it was the region of Wallonia that has decided to suspend the sale of gunpowder to Israel. Italy also announced the suspension of arms exports since October 7, although its Defense Minister later acknowledged that orders that had already been agreed upon before continued to be sent to Israel. with guarantees that they were not going to be used in Gaza.

Something similar happened with Spain, which also announced that it was suspending arms shipments and later it was revealed that it had continued sending ammunition. Madrid said, however, that they were intended for military exercises.

The situation is similar with Canada: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced that possible new arms sales agreements to Israel were frozen, but not those that were already agreed upon.

In Japan it has been a company, Itochu Corporation, that has suspended collaboration with an Israeli weapons manufacturer. And in the Netherlands, a court has forced the country to stop a sale of military aircraft to Israel.

But none of these decisions will have little impact on the war.

More than 95% of Israeli arms imports come from the United States and Germanywhich have not given any clear sign that they will be suspended.

The impact of these arms sales restrictions “is limited, since it is the United States and Germany that supply most of the weapons, while the others send mainly very specific components or equipment that can probably be replaced by others, as well that is not going to change anything,” argues Yossi Mekelberg.

Faced with the Israeli offensive in Gaza and the accumulation of deaths, South Africa opted last December for a different strategy to try to stop it: he went to international justice.

Their lawyers presented a case before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague in which they accused Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinian population of Gaza, something that the Mediterranean country rejects.

In January, the court, which adjudicates disputes between states, issued a provisional ruling ordering Israel to take measures to prevent genocidal acts in Gaza, but stopped short of requiring it to stop its military offensive.

“Israel emerged relatively unscathed from those procedures, but the fact that they were carried out meant that Israel had lost the battle,” Michael Oren, who was Israel’s ambassador to the United States between 2009 and 2013, explained in an interview with the BBC.

Now, however, The alarms are ringing louder in Israeli high places, but due to the actions that another international court may take.

The possibility that the International Criminal Court (ICC) will issue arrest warrants against the main Israeli political and military leaders, including Netanyahu himself, has Israel on edge.

The ICC, which brings cases against individuals for war crimes or crimes against humanity, has been investigating Israel’s actions in the occupied territories for three years and, more recently, also the actions of the militant group Hamas.

In the past it has issued arrest warrants against leaders such as Russian President Vladimir Putin and Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, and soldiers such as Ugandan Joseph Kony.

The International Criminal Court has not confirmed anything, but in the ICC prosecutor’s last visit to Israel and the West Bank, Karim Khan made it clear that “all actors must respect international humanitarian law. If you don’t, don’t complain when my office has to act.”

“Where this is going to lead, I don’t know,” analyzes Mekelberg, “But it should send a message to Israel that actions have consequences.”