by New appointment of Alberto González Amador before the Madrid judge Inmaculada Iglesias. Isabel Díaz Ayuso’s partner appears again this Monday to testify for the two tax crimes and another for falsification of a commercial document charged by the Madrid Prosecutor’s Office, the same one against which the businessman has sued for revealing secrets in relation to a press release that included details of the agreement offered by his defense to avoid going to trial.
The new appearance – the first took place on May 20 without the declaration being made – also coincides with the storm unleashed within the Public Ministry due to the investigation against prosecutors by the Superior Court of Justice of Madridwhich points to a possible indictment of the State Attorney General himself, Álvaro García Ortiz, who has assumed responsibility for the note.
Furthermore, the declaration has the incentive that An agreement could be reached between the parties to avoid the prolongation of the procedure, a possibility that sources from the popular accusations pointed out when the first summons was annulled, pointing out that this is the intention that could be behind the postponement. In its initial proposal for “penal compliance” He offered to serve 8 months in prison and assume a payment of 525,000 euros to avoid trial for tax fraud, in addition to admitting the commission of the crimes for which he is being investigated by Judge Iglesias.
On the occasion of his first summons, and despite the expectation created by the arrival of Díaz Ayuso’s partner at the court, he managed to avoid the press and even used a gray hair wig to mislead his presence in the corridors of the judicial body.
Other defendants
In addition to González Amador, this Monday one of the businessmen allegedly involved in the invoice falsification investigated, Maximiliano, was summoned. Eduardo Niederer, in addition to David Herrera Lobato, Agustín Carrillo Saborido and José Miguel Carrillo Saborido, who are credited with helping Ayuso’s partner prepare false invoices with which to reduce the taxes he had to pay.
The investigation focuses on the alleged criminal evidence on facts related to the Corporate Tax corresponding to the years 2020 and 2021 and an alleged crime of falsification of a commercial document by having provided invoices that do not correspond to services actually provided and contributed with the purpose of reducing the tax amount to be paid.
In the order opening proceedings, the head of the Investigative Court number 19 reasoned that supposedly and “as a consequence of these fraudulent behaviors, the taxpayer has stopped entering the state Public Treasury. for the 2020 Corporation Tax, a fee of 155,000 euros and for the 2021 corporation tax, a fee of 195,951 euros.
The same week, the prosecutors.
For his part, the magistrate of the Superior Court of Madrid Francisco José Goyena has postponed until June 27 the interrogation initially scheduled also for this Monday of the head of the Provincial Prosecutor’s Office of Madrid; María Pilar Rodríguez Fernández, and the prosecutor of the Economic Crimes Section, Julián Salto Torres, against whom Díaz Ayuso’s partner specifically complained.
The businessman accuses both prosecutors of having attacked him “as an instrument to reach” his romantic partner, in clear reference to the president of the Community of Madrid and Judge Goyena wants to hear his version before deciding whether the matter ends implicating in an alleged crime of disclosure to the State Attorney General, Álvaro García Ortiz, who has assumed responsibility for the press release in which the supposed confidential data appeared. If it sees sufficient evidence, the Supreme Court will present a reasoned statement. which is the competent one given the authority of the attorney general.
The summons of the prosecutors takes place after the witness statement given by the Superior Prosecutor of Madrid, Almudena Lastra, who, according to legal sources, told the instructor that the attorney general had sent him a message of WhatsApp in which he assured him that the press release with information about the agreement that the businessman intended to reach to avoid going to trial for fraud against the Treasury had been agreed with the provincial prosecutor of Madrid, María Pilar Rodríguez Fernández, and with the dean of Economic Crimes of Madrid, Virna Alonso Fernández.
Precisely, last week the State Attorney General presented a brief before the Madrid TSJ in which he assumed ultimate responsibility for the publication of the press release that, according to his version“denied false information” in relation to the pact that González Amador’s defense had presented to the Prosecutor’s Office.
